Codinca: Leonard Boyd, David Brashaw

Last week two lovely games were kindly sent to me courtesy of the guys at Backspindle, a designer/publisher group from Northern Ireland. Those games were Codinca, an abstract puzzle game for 2-4 players and Luchador! Mexican Wrestling Dice, a 2-6 player family dice game. Interestingly they also publish two other games based on the works Terry Pratchett, so if that floats your boat and you want to check it out, i’ve linked to their website above.

I unboxed the games for my You Tube channel; I couldn’t possibly resist, because I love ‘unboxings’ and they looked full of delicious components for me to marvel at. I’m pleased to say I was genuinely happy and surprised at the excellent quality of both games. Codinca has a smooth matte finish box that opens up like a little treasure trove (very in-keeping with the theme of the game) and has thick coloured tiles with various patterns etched into the surface. Luchador! is all heavy cardboard, large-scale character cards and chunky fat dice in an array of pretty colours. We also have an actual wrestling ring with springy rope and stand up figures with plastic bases, which I found quite novel and fun.

img_2153

However, this short review will focus on Codinca. It’s straightforward to play, the rules are dead simple, and like other abstract games I’ve played it’s a little bit mind bending, but in a pleasant way and if you want to win a fair amount of strategy is required. In a two-player game you start with four ‘key’ cards that detail the formations you need to make with your tiles in order to ‘unlock’ the treasure and score the card. You also have three ‘spirit’ cards, which will allow you to rotate and shift the tiles around, but these are one use only- so play them carefully! The tiles are laid out as shown on the inside of the box, you pick a colour that represents an element (Earth, Air, Fire, Water) and those are your player tiles to manipulate during the game. Then you’re all set.

img_2152

What commences is a game of back-and-forth turns between players, where you can flip and switch two tiles each turn. You can do this on any two tiles except the last one that was flipped or switched by another player. It’s difficult. I started by thinking ‘oh this is going to be easy’… but I was wrong. Never underestimate your opponent’s power to mess up your treasure hunting plans; one excellent move for them could spell disaster for you. Also never underestimate a certain kind of opponents power to be an ass just for the sake of it. Because you both have the same kind of formations to make, once it becomes clear what you’re trying to achieve then you leave yourself open to be messed with. I learnt this the hard way on my first game, so on the second I made sure to bluff a little bit and take my opponent by surprise at the last minute. I was also pleased with the clever use of my spirit card, which really saved the game for me at one point when I used it to shift one row along to pop the last tile into the next row and score my key card. I gave myself a pat on the back for that one. Once you ‘win’ one of your treasure cards you have to end your turn, and the player who scores all four of their key cards first is the winner.

img_2154

Like many puzzle games I always think how clever they are, such simple rules, so little to set up, not much to the game in a psychical sense, yet so clever. I also found that Codinca (much like the other two abstract games in my collection) was so chilled to play. There’s no need for too much interaction, (except for the occasional eye roll from me) you don’t have to verbalise too much (but I won’t repeat what I did say at a couple of points) and you just kind of switch off, focus on the pieces and play. It’s a really nice feeling. Despite what I’ve said (that’s just gaming banter in my house) it wasn’t particularly vicious, but I guess it depends on your personal playing style.

I always love how games like this (along with certain card games, and other puzzle games) are very compact and transportable. When I play them I always think of going on holiday, going for a drink somewhere, playing it on a lounge floor by the warm glow of a fire…in my dreams, of course, not in reality.

Codinca, like my other abstracts, may not be a game I’d play every night, it may not be one I’d overplay just in case it got stale, and y’know sometimes I have to be in the mood for a puzzle game. But as abstract puzzle games go, it’s a damn good one and i’m just a little bit chuffed to have it in my collection.

More info here

img_2201

Advertisements

Gum Gum Machine, Stefan Dorra, Ralf Zur Linde

FullSizeRender-1

We played Gum Gum Machine for the first time and I am happy to say it was a lot of fun. Pretty much what I expected, it’s not going to set off intellectual fireworks or bust your brain. It’s a cute silly game about making ‘gum gums’ and that’s about it!

IMG_2316

I found the Charlie & The Chocolate Factory aesthetic particularly pleasing, and the modular board is a great addition. It reminded me of games I played when I was a kid like 13th Dead End Drive, and you can interchange the components to change it up a bit each time. Also check out the box inlay….ooooh.

FullSizeRender

So I played a couple of games employing no strategy whatsoever, just having fun with it and lost both times. If you want to win then you can try and memorise bits and pieces to get the gummy you need, make the biggest gummies and get the most points.

The board sends you to different areas and randomises your turn so to memorise the board and find a strategy is tricky and fun. That’s why I like the board because you can make your next game different and it doesn’t get stale. Not the kind of game you’d play nightly because I can imagine it would lose some novelty but as a filler game or something light and fun then it’s a must buy! More Info

 

 

Castles of Mad King Ludwig, Ted Alspach

 

Castles of Mad King Ludwig is a good game. It’s good. But it’s not great. We’ve played it a few times since we got it last year and I still couldn’t put my finger on why it just isn’t as good as Suburbia, until I spoke to Jon tonight and came to a conclusion…

tumblr_o1qw7bL0JW1tqa4njo1_540

I thought I’d like the theme a lot more than I actually do, building the crazy castle, the cute little rooms…the box and the components are lovely and aesthetically it’s a gorgeous game to have in your collection. But nothing about the playing and scoring particularly excites me and that’s probably because, as Jon pointed out, you only get points for joining your tile up to doorways and receive bonus points for connecting to one room, and yeah you get some bonuses for completing rooms, but in my opinion only one of them is worth having, and the end of game extras are just a bit random. Whereas in Suburbia the theme works well for me, it’s a lot smoother and for every turn you get more opportunities to score points because of the hexagonal layout so there’s more to be gained or lost depending on where you place them, so Suburbia is basically more challenging and rewarding. I liked that with Suburbia your town has to make sense and work to win the game and didn’t like the randomness of the mad King’s castle as much.

BUT having said all that Castles isn’t BAD, and maybe if I hadn’t played Suburbia first and loved it I would of liked this more. So yeah, Castles, I wouldn’t dismiss it, and I’d probably play it again, but if you’re going to go for a Ted Alspach this game is definitely the lesser of the two. More Info

tumblr_o1qw7bL0JW1tqa4njo8_540

 

Patchwork, Uwe Rosenberg

Patchwork is a smart little game for two players by Uwe Rosenberg who is a very clever chap indeed! So basically you move around the centre board collecting your button income which you use to buy pieces of quilt (beautifully printed decent cardboard quilt) and some have buttons on and that’s your button income. As you choose your pieces you move the marker to the one you want and you can only choose the three in front of wherever the marker is.

tumblr_o18wwmhxsk1tqa4njo2_400

You build up your board and try to fit it together like a puzzle and fill up as much space as possible because you lose points at the end for your blank squares. The tough part is utilising your space and competing for the pieces so your plans aren’t scuppered. When you run out of buttons you can skip a turn to move spaces ahead to catch up with your opponent and gain buttons for the number of spaces you moved.

Some turns you can’t afford the pieces and don’t have a button to your name, some turns you’re inundated with buttons and don’t want any of the pieces available because they don’t fit your quilt. All in all good fun, quick and simple, we would call this a filler game, so if we wanted to play a couple of games but didn’t have time for two heavy ones we’d get this little gem out. The only thing is that because we verbalise our moves (we don’t sit in silence and just take turns back and forth because we just don’t!) so we ended up saying the word button so much that it lost all meaning! With the supply and demand of games all over the place I personally don’t think it’s worth paying over the odds for. It’s a great game and worth the correct retail price of £17-£20. A welcome addition to our collection. More Info